It seems ironic that established government policy can have the opposite effect of its stated objectives. For example, the vast majority of congressional representatives who support ethanol probably consider themselves to be successful advocates of American agriculture and the family farm. Consider the following well-intentioned statement from Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) when he criticized a coalition that opposes the Federal government's ethanol mandate:"I think that what the group is really asking for is to have the grain farmers subsidize their livestock feed at $3 or $4, like they did or have been over a long period of time -- until two or three years ago when the price of grain got up, and I think they ought to be a little bit em...