Border Tax Rationalized There are both economic and geopolitical reasons being presented for why the G-7 (U.S., Canada, EU, and Japan) should pursue a common carbon border measure. The first is that it is not in Europe’s interest to go it alone. Brussels could sanctimoniously claim itself pure and impose the border tax but if no one follows, it has fewer imports but also gets underpriced in the world market. Worse, it is still stuck with global warming if everyone else goes on polluting. For the U.S., since it is calculated that China’s manufacturing is three times more polluting, a border carbon tax will save American jobs. Donald Trump’s tariffs helped divert imports toward other countries than China and the carbon tax...
Communicating importance of value-added products
Facing increasing pressure to quantify the value of export promotion efforts to investors, a U.S. industry organization retained WPI to develop a quantitative model that better communicated the importance of exports. The resulting model concluded that value-added meat exports contributed $0.45 cents per bushel to the price of corn, increasing support for that sector’s financial support of WPI’s client. In addition to serving the red meat industry with this type of analysis, WPI has generated similar deliverables for the U.S. soybean and poultry/egg industries.