Today's Supreme Court ruling against the federal raisin marketing order sets a precedent for many other such orders for specialty crops as well as for milk.Today the Supreme Court ruled against the federal raisin marketing order in a four-to-five decision, setting a precedent for many other such orders for specialty crops as well as for milk. It ruled that that Marvin and Laura Horne, raisin producers in California who refused to comply with the raisin marketing order instituted in 1949, were due compensation for a federal government "taking" of property under the Fifth Amendment.The marketing order is administered by the Raisin Administrative Committee, which decides how much to market in a given year and assigns a quota to producers. Thos...