232 Confusion WTO dispute settlement rulings are arcane, highly legalistic, but sometimes contradictory to the layman’s eye. The latest case is a ruling against Turkiye for its retaliation against U.S. Section 232 tariffs against steel and aluminum imports from the Turks. A year ago, a panel ruled against the U.S. on the matter, stating there was no war or other emergency in international relations to justify the protection. China has four lists of goods, many agricultural, that confront retaliatory duties as retaliation for the American Section 232 duties. How does the ruling impact China, or for that matter the EU which has temporarily suspended retaliatory duties as the transatlantic partners seek a solution for global steel dumpi...