Trade has become a pivotal issue in the 2016 presidential election, but there is a sound argument that food would be a better target. Trade versus Food Trade has become a pivotal issue in the 2016 presidential election, but there is a sound argument that food would be a better target. Research by Harvard University’s Craig VanGrasstek indicates that there aren’t that many voters left in swing states who are actually at risk of displacement by foreign trade. In other words, most of the damage has already been done. However, others cite a $1 trillion health care cost increase due to the obesity crisis (diabetes, heart disease, cancer, etc.) in arguing that food and nutrition is a far more important topic for national discussion. More Farm...