False Equivalence In asserting its right to be treated like a market economy, China claimed in Geneva this week that its industrial subsidies are no different than the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy or U.S. corn prices. This is false equivalence in terms of both law and scale. First, the Uruguay Round agreement specifically provides for the agriculture subsidies, whereas China exploits a loophole in the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. Second, agriculture represents just 1.5 percent of EU gross domestic product (GDP) and 1.0 percent of the American economy. By contrast, China’s national government is manipulating nearly 40 percent of its major industries via their being state-owned. Based on the WTO appellat...